Fintech Business
Common payment augmentation patterns for FinTech enterprises, from adding processors to improving routing, vaulting, and operational visibility.
Across conversations with multiple FinTech enterprises, a clear pattern emerges: most teams already operate mature payment infrastructures - including internal routing engines, risk systems, vaults, PCI boundaries, monitoring layers, and merchant-facing platforms. These teams are not looking to replace their systems. Instead, they look for ways to augment their existing architecture with additional PSP coverage, better routing logic, expanded authentication flows, token portability, and improved operational observability.
Hyperswitch is designed to act as an augmentation layer that integrates cleanly into existing FinTech stacks. Each capability - connectors, routing, retries, vaulting, relay APIs, webhooks, and monitoring, can be adopted independently, without requiring a full-stack migration.
Below are the FinTech-specific augmentation patterns observed consistently across enterprise conversations.
Use Case 1 - Connector-first expansion of PSPs, APMs, 3DS, fraud, and token services
A recurring theme among FinTech enterprises, especially those scaling globally, is the increasing need to onboard additional processors, regional acquirers, APMs, 3DS providers, and fraud/Risk engines. This typically appears when entering new markets, supporting large merchant requirements, or attempting to diversify processing pathways. Engineering teams often highlight the operational and maintenance cost of building and maintaining these integrations internally.
Solution
Hyperswitch supports a Connector-First Augmentation Mode where enterprises integrate only the connector layer without adopting routing or checkout systems. This enables:
Faster onboarding of new PSPs/APMs
Unified request and response schemas
Unified webhook handling across connectors
Optional stateless translation mode for internal hosting
Integration of 3DS providers, fraud systems, and risk tooling
PSP-aware retry semantics
The ability for enterprise teams to contribute connectors directly (common in open-source collaboration models)
This approach reduces engineering overhead and avoids disruptions to existing payment flows
Relevant Documentation
Use Case 2 - Preference for self-hosted, infrastructure-level deployment
Several FinTech enterprises prefer to run orchestration components inside their own infrastructure due to strict compliance requirements, internal security policies, data governance rules, or established PCI boundaries. This pattern is especially common among companies operating at enterprise scale or serving regulated markets.
Solution
Hyperswitch supports a fully self-hosted deployment model:
Deploy connectors, routing, vaulting, and relay services inside the enterprise cloud
Ensure no external data egress
Maintain full control of logs, audits, and PCI boundaries
Dedicated enterprise support lanes
Predictable upgrade paths
Ability to run Hyperswitch as an internal microservice
This provides the flexibility needed to fit within existing enterprise security and compliance frameworks
Relevant Documentation
Use Case 3 - Augmenting routing and retry systems to improve authorization performance
Many FinTech teams already maintain routing engines internally, but often surface challenges related to scaling them: adding new PSP pathways, implementing decline-aware retries, supporting regional fallback logic, and balancing performance-based routing rules. Improving CIT/MIT authorization rates is frequently mentioned as a priority.
Solution
Hyperswitch provides a modular routing engine that can be inserted after an enterprise’s risk system and before its processors, enabling:
Routing based on BIN, region, PSP performance, card network, geography
A/B routing tests
PSP-aware retries (e.g., soft declines → alternate PSP)
Real-time routing configuration updates
Geo-fallback logic for redundancy
Full visibility into routing decisions
Preservation of raw PSP responses for data science teams
This allows enterprises to enhance routing performance without rewriting internal systems.
Relevant Documentation
Use Case 4 - Vaulting and token augmentation (PSP vaults, external vaults, network tokens)
In enterprise discussions, vault-related concerns surface frequently: token portability, region-based vault segmentation, support for network tokens, account updater flows, or the ability to migrate PSP vaults without disrupting existing merchants. These appear especially during global expansion or PSP migrations.
Solution
Hyperswitch provides flexible vaulting models:
External Vault Mode (use enterprise’s existing vault)
Unified Vault for token portability across PSPs
PSP-Native Vaulting with normalized APIs
Regionally scoped vaults for multi-market operations
Network Tokenization (where supported by PSPs)
Account Updater support
Support for zero-downtime token migrations
These patterns help enterprises manage token flows cleanly while maintaining PCI and architectural boundaries.
Relevant Documentation
Use Case 5 - Partial lifecycle control through Relay APIs
Some FinTech enterprises do not orchestrate end-to-end payment flows; instead, they operate only on specific lifecycle events such as captures, voids, or refunds. Teams often look for ways to interact with payments made through different PSPs without rewriting internal workflows.
Solution
Hyperswitch’s Relay API layer enables enterprises to:
Issue PSP-native refunds, voids, and captures
Retrieve PSP-native transaction state
Update metadata or supplemental fields
Trigger ops flows (post-auth updates, reconciliation hooks)
Perform partial lifecycle control without adopting a full orchestration system
This modular approach helps maintain existing operational structures while expanding capabilities.
Use Case 6 - Normalizing PSP webhooks, error codes, and status models
Enterprises frequently mention the operational complexity caused by differing webhook formats, error codes, settlement statuses, and dispute flows across processors. This fragmentation increases the load on internal ops and engineering teams.
Solution
Hyperswitch provides:
A unified error taxonomy
Consistent webhook event structures
Normalized dispute/chargeback flows
Raw PSP payloads preserved for audit and analysis
Retry-safe semantics
Consistent transaction status lineage
This consolidation streamlines operational tooling and reduces maintenance complexity.
Use Case 7 - Enterprise-grade observability, SLAs, and monitoring
Enterprise teams often highlight the need for granular operational visibility — PSP latency metrics, routing outcomes, retries, audit trails, and SLA-level visibility across merchants or regions.
Solution
Hyperswitch provides:
Connector health checks and telemetry
PSP-level latency and performance monitoring
Complete audit logs
Replayable webhook and event logs
Retry and fallback visibility
Distributed tracing endpoints
Region/merchant/profile-based SLA segmentation
These capabilities help enterprise teams monitor and optimize payment infrastructure with precision.
Last updated
Was this helpful?

